The books listed here are all held by the University of South Carolina Law Library.
Click on a title to see whether the book is currently available or checked out, and where in the law library it can be found.
Learn more on how to use the USC Law Library, if you are a:
HeinOnline - Law Journal Library
suggested search query "law firm cybersecurity"
Preliminary results include:
Getting Serious about Law Firm Cybersecurity [comments]
New Jersey Lawyer, Vol. 2016, Issue 300 (June 2016), pp. 54-58
Randall, Karen Painter; Kroll, Steven A.
6 Tips for Law Firm Cybersecurity [article]
Legal Management, Vol. 36, Issue 9 (October 2017), pp. 18-21
Hogan, Chris
Internal Office Practices Can Make or Break a Law Firm's Cybersecurity [article]
Montana Lawyer, Vol. 41, Issue 3 (December/January 2015), pp. 16-17
MacLean, Erin F.; Micu, Deborah M.
Securing Your Law Firm's Website: A Critical Cybersecurity Task [article]
Hot Buttons
Law Practice, Vol. 43, Issue 2 (March/April 2017), pp. 26-29
Nelson, Sharon D.; Simek, John W.
HeinOnline - Law Journal Library
suggest narrowing to South Carolina Lawyer magazine, then query "law firm cybersecurity"
Preliminary results include:
How to Be Sure You're Cybersecure [article]
South Carolina Lawyer, Vol. 29, Issue 6 (May 2018), pp. 19-24
Finkel, Ed
2017 Technethics Year in Review [notes]
South Carolina Lawyer, Vol. 29, Issue 5 (March 2018), pp. 12-14
Crystal, Nathan
Cyber Security for Law Firms [notes]
South Carolina Lawyer, Vol. 29, Issue 2 (September 2017), pp. 10-12
Troutman, Courtney
Source: Symantec Internet Security Threat Report, Volume 21, April 2016
Source: CNET, techlicious, and lifehacker.
Ethics in Cybersecurity:
- Duty of Confidentiality
- Duty of Competence
- Duty to Supervise Staff and Third Parties
Source: Ethics and Cybersecurity: Obligations to Protect Client Data, Drew Simshaw and Stephen S. Wu, ABA Section of Labor & Employment Law, March 2015.
SCACR Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality of Information), Comments 19 and 20
SCACR Rule 1.1 (Competence), Comment 8
SCACR Rule 5.3 (Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants), Comment 1